Monday, 7 December 2015
Thursday, 8 October 2015
Indian Astronomy Satellite-ASTROSTAT
On September 28th Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO)
has scripted yet another milestone by successfully launching Astrostat
satellite dedicated exclusively for astronomical studies. Indian astronomers
are immensely excited at the prospect of state-of art capabilities offered by this
satellite. Designed for effective life span of five years, the satellite will
endow Indian astronomers to study “radiation bands that carry information about
the exotic neutron stars, newly born or exploding stars” and observe the dense
effusion of hot gases around black holes. Indian ground based telescopes- Giant Meter
wave Radio Telescope at Pune and the Indian Astronomical Observatory at Ladakh enable
scientists to detect radio waves and infrared radiations that penetrate earth’s
atmosphere but don’t have scientific instruments to study astronomical
phenomena occurring in the Ultraviolet rays, X-rays and gamma-rays. Till now
they used to depend on the NASA’s Nuclear Spectroscopic Array (NuSTAR) and ESA
(European Space Agency) to study various radiation bands.
Astrostat has five
instruments on board to detect multi-wavelength radiations ranging from visible
light to Ultraviolet and from low-energy through high energy X-ray radiations. The instruments include- Ultraviolet Imaging
Telescope, Soft X-ray imaging telescope, Large Area X-ray proportional
Counters, Cadmium Zinc telluride Imagers, Scanning Sky Monitor, and charged
particle monitor. The charged particle monitor (CPM) designed to detect charged
particles and sensitive to protons above 1 MeV (Mega electron Volt). Astrostat
is a collaborative effort of many institutes- Tata Institute of Fundamental
Research (TIFR), Mumbai, Indian Institute of Astrophysics Bangalore, Raman Research
Institute Bangalore, InterUniversity Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics
Pune, Bhabha Atomic Research centre Mumbai, S.N Bose National Centre for Basic
Sciences Kolkata, Canadian Space Agency, University of Leichester. The unique
range of observatory capabilities will entail it to have a wide coverage
unattained by any of the international space observatories till now.
The first Indian space observatory having payload of 1513 kg was launched into the Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
of 650km from the surface of the earth by ISRO’s work horse PSLV-C30 at an
inclination of 6 degrees from the equator. Satellites in the low earth orbits
have to pass through the dense radiation belts of South Atlantic Anamoly (SAA)
region that has high fluxes of protons and electrons. Great care has to be
exerted when satellite passes through these regions as the high density of the
energetic particles can often cause glitches in the data and can permanently
damage sensitive instruments onboard.
The idea of having a space observatory was first conceived by
astrophysicist Lyman Spitzer in 1946 as the electromagnetic radiations entering
earth’s atmosphere are filtered and thus obstruct the view of the celestial
bodies. This objective was realized with the launch of the Hubble Space
Telescope named after Edwin Hubble in 1990 by NASA. Till date it is the largest
and the most versatile telescope providing extremely high-resolution space
images. It was uniquely designed to be serviced by astronauts and eventually it
was serviced in 1993 for the first time when its main mirror was grounded
inaccurately. Last servicing was done in 2009 and it is expected to last till
2030-40. Its successor James Webb Space telescope (JWST) is scheduled for
launch in 2018.
India’s tryst with space observatory began in 1996 when ISRO
carried out satellite-bound Indian X-Ray Astronomy Experiment in 1996. ISRO has approved Astrostat in 2004 but its
launch was inadvertently delayed. Along with the Astrostat satellite, the
enhanced rocket launcher PSLV in XL configuration on its successful thirtieth
launch mission piggy backed six satellites- 76kg LAPAN-A2 of Indonesia, 14kg
NLS of Canada and four identical LEMUR satellites of US each weighing 28kg. In
all the 320 tonne, 45m tall PSLV-C30 carried seven satellites of payload
1613kg.
The primary objectives of Astrostat are to study binary star
systems containing neutron stars and black holes, study and estimate the
magnetic fields of neutron stars, study star birth-regions and high energy
processes occurring beyond our galaxy. While it is no parallel to the Hubble
Space telescope it can be lauded as the Indian Hubble Space Telescope for
Astrostat is not as powerful, as precise, as the illustrious NASA observatory.
It is culmination of humble efforts of the ISRO and one of its kind bestowed
with multi—wavelength capabilities. With this launch India has joined the
scientific elite countries- the US, Russia, European Space Agency and Japan
that own a space observatory.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Monday, 31 August 2015
ISRO Makes India Proud Again: Successfully Hoists GSAT-6 satellite
ISRO has done it once again. The astounding success of the
GSLV D-6 reinforced that the indigenous launch vehicle is now fully ready for
commercial satellite launching programme. Till now India’s reliable work horse
PSLV (Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle) with its meticulous delivery has been the
cynosure of ISRO. GSLV has now joined the club. The 161 feet tall, GSLV-D6
weighing 416 tonnes at liftoff is the fifth developmental flight in GSLV series,
has launched the 2117 kg GSAT-6
communication satellite with remarkable precision on August 27th
from the 2nd launch pad of Satish Dhawan Space Centre or SrihariKota
Range (SHAR). All the parameters time, relative velocity, range, altitude and
acceleration profiles of the GSLV-6 were text book perfect.
India’s tryst with Geosynchronous satellite Launch vehicles
(GSLV) began with its first flight in 2001. But the success of these vehicles
has been extremely erratic wherein ISRO could register only three successful
launches out of seven attempts. ISRO’s GSLV mission received major fillip
following the magnificent performance of indigenously developed GSLV-D5 that
hoisted GSAT-14 satellite on January 5th 2014.
Initially ISRO used Russian built cryogenic engines in GSLVs.
GSLVs are highly preferred launch vehicles to deliver communication satellites
of INSAT (Indian National Satellite System) and GSAT (Geosynchronous satellite)
series weighing more than 2 tonnes. INSAT series comprises of multipurpose geo-stationary
satellites that cater to telecommunications, broadcasting, meteorology, search
and rescue operations. GSATs aid in digital audio, data and video broadcasting.
GSLV can hoist satellites weighing more than 2 tonnes into the GTO orbit
(Geosychronous Transfer Orbit), which is 36,000km from the equator.
GSLV has three stages- first stage comprises of 138 tonne
solid rotor motor and augmented by 4 liquid strap-ons. The second stage
contains a single Vikas engine that burns for 150 sec and ignites the third
stage also referred to as Cryogenic Upper Stage (CUS). CUS, the heart of the
GSLV launch vehicle is extremely complex as compared to the solid or the
earth-storable liquid propellant rocket stages. The propellants used in
cryogenic engine the liquefied oxygen that exists at -183C and the liquid
Hydrogen at -253 C. These are pumped into the CUS using turbo pumps running at
40,000rpm 2 hours before the scheduled launch. The structural and thermal
conditions required for operating at extremely low temperatures makes the launch
extremely challenging. The liquefied propellants are very efficient, produce
enormous thrust per unit mass compared to other fuels, environmentally safe and
produce huge amounts of water during liftoff. The cryogenic engines require
much less fuel than needed otherwise.
ISRO scientists toiled extremely hard to develop indigenous
CUS as they replaced Russian Cryogenic engines which were used in rocket’s
earlier experimental flights. India has so far built three indigenous CUS engines.
GSLV Mk-II fitted with the first CUS engine blew up mid air in 2010 during its
flight. Mission scientists then returned
to their drawing board toiled hard and nailed down all the technical glitches.
The second CUS engine used in the GSLV-5 was a huge success. The meticulous
delivery of GSLV-D6 now vouched credibility in developing the GSLV launch
vehicles.
GSAT-6 is India’s 25th geo stationary
communication satellite and twelfth in GSAT series and caters to strategic
purposes. It is an advanced communication satellite and provides S-band
communication services in the country.
After reaching the GTO the satellite’s propulsion system will take over
and positions it at the orbital destination of 83 degrees East Longitude. Of
the 2117 kg, satellite’s dry mass is 985 kg. It is endowed with two advanced
features-it has one of the largest S-band Unfurable antenna of 6 meter
diameter. This antenna will utilise five spot beams over Indian main land and
with frequency reuse scheme it will increase frequency spectrum utilisation
efficiency. Another advanced feature is the 70 V bus. The satellite whose life
expectancy is 9 years is the second military satellite developed at a cost of
265 crores.
India’s
journey towards the cryogenic motor development has been jittery.
India has initiated GSLV project in 1990 and signed a contract with Russia for
supply of 7 cryogenic engines of 7.5 tons thrust along with the transfer of
cryogenic technology. But in 1993, the US severely objected Russia selling
cryogenic technology to India as this would be a violation under the Missile
technology Control regime (MTCR). MTCR is an informal agreement and voluntary
partnership between 34 members. The regime was formed by the G-7 industrial
nations-US, UK, France, Canada, Italy, Germany and Japan with an objective of
limiting the proliferation of the missiles and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)
technology capable of carrying 500kg payload to an altitude of 300km. It has 34
members which includes Russia. As per MTCR guidelines, members established
a “no undercut” policy means if a member denies sale of technology to another
country, then the policy has to be strictly adhered by all other members. Thus
now 117 nations enforce restrictions on exports to control the proliferation of
UAV’s.
Hence
ISRO has been single-handedly working for developing this technology jealously
shielded by all nations. More over the technology was denied as business
interests of Europe, Russia and the US would be severely threatened by the
arrival of India in this heavy vehicle-launch business. With nations imposing
severe clamp down on transfer of technology Indian scientists with their gritty
resolve developed cryogenic technology. This will now reduce our reliability on
foreign launchers like European Space Agency’s (ESA) Ariane (which charges
$20,000 to deploy a kilogram of payload to GTO) for launching communication
satellites.
Currently,
the Indian work horse PSLV (Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle) has proven its launch capability by launching
76 (31 Indian and 45 foreign) satellites so far. PSLV are capable of carrying
remote sensing satellites which are lighter and place them in polar orbits.
These satellites weigh from few hundred kilograms to about a tonne. Polar orbits are the orbits in
which satellites don’t move in tandem with the rotation of the earth and hence
they are not suitable for communication. The cost efficiency and the
reliability of PSLVs have been established in the segment of the smaller
satellites. India already boasts of 30 to 35% cheaper launches than other
countries. Whereas Communication satellites are heavier, weighing 2 to 5 tonnes
need big boosters in the GSLV series of vehicles to hoist these satellites into
the geosynchronous orbits 36,000km above the equator, where the satellite
moves in tandem to earth’s rotation and hence service of satellite is available
to the user all the time.
The
launch vehicle along with its satellite today carried the spirits of ISRO
scientists, who want to break the jinx of launching the heavy vehicle. India now
established its credentials in the launching the heavier communication
satellites where the scope for real business of global satellite launching
lies. India has now joined the elite club of nations that include United
States, Russia, France, Japan and China to clinch its rightful share in the
ever emerging market of $300 billion dollars satellite launch services.
In
1993 when developed countries of the world have declared technology apartheid
against India, Indian scientists have silently vowed to develop the cryogenic
technology. In this incredible journey of developing the cryogenic engines,
India has used all six of the seven Russian cryogenic engines and one
indigenously developed engine. ISRO began its tryst with GSLV (Geo Synchronous
Launch Vehicle) containing the cryogenic engines in 2001. But unfortunately
ISRO could register just three successful launches. Now after undergoing the
gruelling exercise of developing the technology India can proudly flaunt its
mastery in the cutting edge technology. Cryogenic technology has been denied to
India as the western world thought India to be a potential threat to their
business interests in the emerging market of the global satellite launching.
The
heightened fears of the West costed Indian Space programme dearly due to
the numerous obstacles and delays caused by vested interests. The sabotage in
the form of the dubious spying case framed against two exceptionally brilliant
scientists- in-charge Nambi Narayanan and D. Sasi Kumar of the cryogenic programme
in ISRO has delayed our programme by 19 years. Apart from successfully ripping
them off the distinguished scientific career, the case has led to their
unceremonious exit from the organisation. Besides being labelled as spies the
severe torment and humiliation suffered by them is inexplicable. Thus the west
tactfully delayed India’s Cryotechnology mission development for the lack of
talented personnel who could spear head the project.
The
sabotage theory holds ground as the book “Russia in Space- A failed frontier”
written by the British space writer Brian Harvey mentions about the plans of
the imperilled nations and role of CIA in blocking India from perfecting the
cryo technology. Nations feared that India’s progress might be detrimental to
their prospects in the business of the space technology and nuclear energy.
Hence these scandals were witch crafted to derail and delay the Indian
technological missions which could otherwise lead the nation into a sphere of
self-reliance.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Friday, 21 August 2015
Genome Sequencing of Octopus Unravels Intelligence Traits
Among invertebrates Octopus are acclaimed to be most
intelligent animals and have largest nervous system. Octopus, a Mollusc falls
under category of modern cephalopod. Other important soft shelled smart animals
that belong to the class Cephalopods are Cuttle fish, Squid and Nautilus.
While it is known that vertebrates with their distinct
nervous system are far more intelligent scientists are keen about investigating
the system that renders these invertebrates with superior cognitive skills.
Caroline Albertin and her colleagues of University of Chicago in an effort to
understand the basis for intelligence in Cephalopods have mapped the genome of
Octopus. The report published in the Nature journal is collaborative effort of
the University of Chicago, University of California Berkeley, University of
Heidelberg, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology. The scientists have
carried out gene expression studies of 12 different tissues as well. They have
identified two genetic families whose presence is more pronounced than the
simpler Molluscs. These are the C2H2 Zinc-finger transcription proteins and the
protocadherin proteins that regulate neuronal development.
Octopus has uniquely shelled eight tentacles that serve as
prehensile arms, suckers, cameras and has effective colouring system to camouflage.
It has unusually large genome almost as large as the human genome and has 33,000
protein coding genes compared to 25,000 of human beings.
Sophisticated Cephalopods have nearly half a billion neuronal
cells as against 200 million in rat. These contribute to the extraordinary
observational learning, complex problem solving, task-dependent conditional
discrimination. Octopus has twice the number of Protocadherins genes than mammals.
Protocadherin proteins are responsible for synaptic specificity, short-range
interactions needed for circuit formation. These contribute to neuronal
complexity of Octopus and accounts of its unusually large sized brain. Even the
anatomy of various important organs is also peculiar. The tentacles have
independent computing capacity and hence even if they are separated from main
body they can execute cognitive tasks.
C2H2 transcripts are found in the nervous tissue and embryonic
tissues and have crucial role in cell fate determination, transposon silencing
and early development. Elevated transposon expression accounts for elevated
memory and learning. Interestingly, nearly half of the octopus genome is made
of transposons which are mobile. They translocate to new locations causing enhancement
or decrease of gene expression. Octopus has 18,000 Zinc-finger transcription
genes second to 20,000 genes of Elephants. These transcription factor genes
adjust the expression of other genes and in Octopus these regulates the genes
in suckers and in receptors of skin. Suckers have large number of genes that
code for the neuronal transmitter acetyl choline. Octopus has proteins
reflectins coded by six genes on skin. These proteins help in altering the
brightness of the light in several ways and in effectively disguising itself. Unlike
higher vertebrates where large number of gene duplications contributes to large
genomes Octopus genes have evolved genuinely in response to natural selection.
Unlike vertebrates, neurons in Octopus are not concentrated
in brain and spinal cord. But these travel to localised organs of the body like
tentacles/arms. They appear as protuberances and take up specialised function
depending upon their location. While brain can completely take over the control
of entire body, Octopus has a decentralised nervous system that allows the arms
to function autonomously. Hence they are less dependent on the long range
signal transmissions even. Precisely, this mechanism allows octopus to act
quickly and instinctively. Neurobiologists and Roboticists marvel this very
unique kind of intelligence characteristic of Octopus.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Tuesday, 14 July 2015
New Horizons Explores The Frigid World of Pluto
NASA’s New Horizon spacecraft designed to flyby Pluto having
travelled five billion kilometres for
the past nine and half years is going to have its closely approach with the
dwarf planet by 7:50 am, Eastern Day Light Time on July 14th 2015.
Astronomers and science enthusiasts’ world over are passionately waiting for
this epic moment that will last for few minutes. The probe will whiz past the
planet’s surface at a velocity of 53,000 kmph during which it will capture
thousands of images, collect scientific data of Pluto’s atmosphere, its surface
and environment. Pluto has been the least explored planet in the solar system
and no dedicated mission was ever commissioned for its study. New Horizons
mission was instituted to study Pluto and explore the vast swarm of frosty
bodies lying beyond Neptune and the bodies faintly moving in the frigid Kuiper
belt region.
The probe has travelled so far that it will take 4.5 hrs for
the radio signal sent from earth to reach the space craft. Hence it will remain
radio silent for the entire period of its closet encounter with Pluto and
Charon as the limited computing ability of the probe will be utilised in
collecting the necessary data. Close-up image and scientific data will be sent
to earth over a period of next 26 months and first high resolution pictures of
Pluto are expected to be transmitted by July 15th. The chances of
this event becoming successfully are very high as the chances of collision of
debris with probe is 1 in 10,000. This mission is of great relevance as it
would shed light on less know details of the planet, its composition, moons and
atmosphere but also it would help us in understanding the evolution of solar
system including the Earth.
History of Pluto
The year 2015 marks the 85th anniversary of
discovery of the dwarf planet Pluto.
In 1930 a 24 year old farmer-turned-astronomer Clyde Tombaugh
discovered the planet Pluto. The existence of a planet X in close proximity to
Neptune was suspected by the founder of Lowell Observatory, Percival Lowell on
the basis of perturbations experienced by the orbit of Neptune. The discovery
of the planet was announced on March 13th that coincided with the
birthday of Percival Lowell and with the discovery of the planet Uranus a
century and half earlier. Soon
suggestions were invited for naming of the new planet. The planet was
christened as Pluto after the Roman God of underworld as per suggestions of 11
year old Venetia Burney of Oxford, UK.
As a mark of respect, the dust counter built by students aboard NASA’s
New Horizons Space craft is named as Venetia.
In 1978 James Christy and Robert Harrington of the US Naval
Observatory at Flagstaff discovered Charon, the largest moon of Pluto. Charon
in Roman Mythology refers to the ferryman who brings souls of dead men to the
lair of Pluto. The moon which was visible as a bulge regularly appeared and
disappeared in the images as Pluto. Pluto and Charon seemed to orbit their
mutual centre of gravity and also because of the bigger size of Charon, these
two bodies were referred to as Binary Planets.
In 1988 astronomers aboard the Kuiper Airborne Observatory
made crucial observations about the atmosphere of Pluto. They indicated that
Pluto’s surface is covered by ice made of Methane, Nitrogen and Carbon monoxide.
These ices sublimate to form the thin atmosphere of Pluto.
In 2005 Hal Weaver and his colleagues at John Hopkins
Institute revealed the presence of two moons of Pluto, Nix and Hydra. Other
moons Kereberos and Styx were discovered in 2010 and 2011. Styx is faintest of
all moons.
On January 19th 2006 the New Horizons space craft,
the first probe to Pluto lifted off from the Cape Canaveral Air Force Base,
Florida
In August 2006, International Astronomical Union (IAU)
demoted Pluto to the status of dwarf planet as it failed to qualify the new
definition of a planet. It dictates that a planet must orbit around the sun, it
should be large enough for its gravity to shape it into a sphere and its must
have cleared its orbit of other similar-sized bodies. Pluto was relatively
small compared to the objects in its surrounding. It was just another object in
Kuiper belt and hence now the solar system is reduced from the earlier number
of nine to eight planets.
Following the reclassification of Pluto a section of scientific
community terribly opposed the new definition of the planet. Later in 2008, all
the trans-Neptunian dwarf bodies were classified under the category of Plutoids.
Also a new system of classification came into existence under the category of
dwarf planets which includes five planets in solar system: Pluto, Ceres,
Haumea, Makemake and Eris (Pluto destroyer).
Solar System is demarcated into three categories of planets-
the inner rocky planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars) the outer gas giants
(Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) and the ice dwarfs located on outer
fringes of the Solar system or the Kuiper belt region. These include Pluto and
Charon.
US Missions to Planets
The US has sent a space probe to each and every planet so far
and with this New Horizon mission its aims to complete the initial
reconnaissance of the solar system. In 1960 NASA has envisioned a plan of
sending probes to all the five planets. Missions were designed to take the
advantage of the celestial phenomenon of rare alignment of Jupiter, Saturn,
Uranus and Neptune (occurs once in every 175 years) and assisted flybys.
However due to highly constrained budget of NASA, the grand mission has been
reduced to missions Voyager 1 and Voyager 2. These missions have successfully
completed the flybys of the four gas giants. By 1989, Pluto was the only
bonafide planet left unexplored. However when Pluto was derecognised as a
planet in 2006, it meant that all planets were explored.
New Horizons Mission
Several programs like the Pluto fast flyby, Pluto Kuiper
Express were designed to study and understand the key characteristics of
Pluto’s atmosphere. But these were abandoned due to budgetary constraints. By
2001 New Horizons Mission was selected by the NASA’s New Frontier Program. Over
the next five years South West Research Institute (SRI) and John Hopkins Applied
Physics Laboratory built the spacecraft. Unlike the spacecrafts designed for
the inner solar system, this space craft had limited electronic activity. Since
it is destined to travel to the outer boundaries of the space the interior
paint and exterior blanket were designed to maximise heat retention in the
outer space. As it moved into realms farther from the Sun, the probe wasn’t
equipped with solar arrays. Instead it had built in Radio Isotope
Thermoelectric Generator (RTG) to provide power that can last through the launch
and Pluto-Charon encounter. Spacecraft carried the Plutonium-238 Oxide pellets
as fuel enclosed in the Iridium and Graphite shell. Hence the US Department of
Energy carried out several pre-launch tests to make sure that the launch
wouldn’t cause accidental contamination of the Earth’s atmosphere. Altogether
there are seven scientific instruments on board
Launch and Flybys
The New Horizons was scheduled for a launch on January 11th
2006 to allow for the gravity of Jupiter to assist a flyby. It soon missed the target and was the launch
was postponed to January 17th but was stalled due to high winds.
Second attempt on the next day was halted due to low clouds. Finally the probe,
hoisted by the Atlas V 551 variant lifted off majestically from the Cape
Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida on January 19th. During its course of flight it had an
incidental encounter with the asteroid 132524 APL in June 2006 from a distance
of 63, 297 miles followed by a Jovian (Jupiter and its moons) encounter in 2007
and finally with Pluto in 2015.
Accomplishments
These encounters acted as trial runs for the scientists at
ground station to use some instruments on board for making crucial observations
and test space craft’s ability to perform automated manoeuvres during planetary
flyby operations. Spacecraft was fitted with state-of-art instruments that
delivered good quality of data about the atmospheric conditions, structures and
composition of Jupiter clouds. It discovered debris from recent collisions
within Jupiter rings and searched for new rings and moons of Jupiter as well.
The probe was so meticulously designed that the gravity
assisted sling shot manoeuvre during the Jupiter flyby has accelerated probe
velocity to 53,000kmph relative to Sun. This shortened the probe’s journey to
Pluto by three years. Following close encounter with Jupiter the mission
command has decided to send the probe into a phase of hibernation which lasted
from February 2007 to December 2014. The probe was intermittently awakened by
the flight control team to keep systems operational. It crossed the Orbital
Boundary of Saturn in March 2008 and Uranus in March 2011.
In July 2014 during its non-hibernation phase the probe successfully
imaged Pluto and Charon separated by a distance of 2.4 AU (average orbital
distance of Earth from Sun) as two distinct bodies. In December 2014, the probe
was finally awakened by the NASA team and official operations began in January
2015. By February 2015, it captured the first images of Hydra and Nix and by
end of April the probe could capture images of Kerberos and Styx. In mid May
the probe delivered high resolution images of entire Plutonian system and
started making observations of Kuiper belt objects too. The probe encountered a
minor technical glitch on July 4th following which it entered into
safe mode. Soon it was rectified and it officially entered flyby mode by July 8th. The close approach flyby mode is destined for
July 14th when the New Horizons will pass by Pluto from a distance
of 12,500 kilometers and 28,800
kilometers from Charon. Since probes close approach to Charon is more than
twice the distance of Pluto the images of Charon will be twice as coarser than
those of Pluto.
Post Pluto Flyby
After the completion of the Pluto’s flyby operation, the
probe instead of entering into the orbit of dwarf planet will enter into the
deeper recesses of space into the Kuiper belt objects. It was planned that the
probe will identify the Kuiper Belt Objects (KBO). In this process if the probe
travels beyond orbital boundary of 55AU, communication system will become weak,
power supply too will run out and chances of assisted flybys would become
bleak. Scientists have identified three KBO in range of 43 and 44 AU for
plausible flybys but the final decision will be taken in August 2015.
Post flybys of KBO the probe is expected to join Voyager
probes on the outer realms of Solar System. Based on the Plutonium decay, the
probe is expected to be active till 2026. If it is healthy and robust like the
Voyagers by the time it reached Heliosphere, it can meet Heliopause in 2047 and
join Voyagers 1 and 2 floating in the interstellar space.
The mission is a glorious tribute to the scientific temper and
inquisitiveness of the human mind. It reflects the deep seated urge of the
humankind to explore, understand and study the intricacies of the celestial
World and the invincible space.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Monday, 6 July 2015
Changing Dietary Habits: Inclement Effects on Global Climate
Changing global climate has been posing severe challenges for
healthy living. An international research report published in the Lancet journal
recently warns about the looming “threat of the changing climate that can wipe
out the health progress over the past 50 years”.
The report broaches on the direct and
indirect effects of climate changes on the health. Direct effects refers to increase
in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events like heat waves,
floods, drought and storms whose impact is enormous on health. The worst ever
death toll recorded in India and Pakistan due to the severe heat wave this year
fall under this category. Indirect impacts of climate changes include the changes
in the infection patterns, effects of emissions, uncertainty regarding
availability of food leading to malnutrition. Health effects also include those
related to involuntary migration of people forcing them to leave the affected
regions in search of better living conditions. This reduces social stability
would indirectly affect the health.
The compendium, a collaborative effort of number of European
and Chinese Climate Scientists, Environmental Scientists, Social Scientists,
Medical and Health scholars, Energy policy experts, engineers and others have
cautioned that major gains accrued in human health might be frittered away by
the changes in climate. It elucidates the role of emissions in stunting
positive health benefits and advised countries to cut down fossil fuel
consumption to lower the incidence of respiratory diseases. This is congruent
to the alarming levels of pollution in the capital city of Delhi where children
are becoming more susceptible to life-threatening respiratory diseases. It also
advised nations to reduce the consumption of red meat which is not
environmentally friendly and strictly recommended a change in dietary habits.
Another major threat to global health in recent years has been the increased
incidence of conflict.
It also proposed to initiate a new independent global action
plan “Countdown to 2030: Climate Change and Health Action.” The objectives of
the plan will be carried out by an organisation that monitors the link between
health status and affect of climate change and to UN every two years. Lancet
Commission report further emphasises the need for strong international
consensus to create a global economy wherein carbon emissions are reduced. This
in turn would improve the health status. The report has a great bearing on the
talks in climate change on global health with regard to UN Climate Change
Conference, COP 21 to be held in Paris from 30th November to 11th
December 2015.
Research indicates that change in the dietary habits has a
great impact on the climate change. Though the statement is little intriguing,
scientific study and resource utilisation pattern clearly suggested that plant
based diet is more healthy and environmental friendly than meat diet. Food and
Agriculture Organisation (FAO) reports also expounded that changing dietary
habits in the past few decades have contributed to current environmental degradation
and resource stress.
In recent times due to rise in income levels people are
increasingly turning towards high energy food sources like animal sources
especially meat. While it took a century for Europe to reach a stage where
every meal has meat a similar change could be witnessed in majority of Asian
countries within a generation. People are now switching to meat based meal.
Obtaining proteins from meat is far more resource intensive than from plants as
they use more cropland, water and energy. Their transportation to slaughter
houses and processing of the meat are high energy intensive processes. Hence
consumption of meat depletes more natural resources and consequently puts great
pressure on food production systems, damages ecosystem and triggers climate
change. Meat production is 10 times more water intensive than plant- calories.
It is estimated that 15,415 litres of water is need to produce a kilogram of beef.
In other words nearly 30 plant calories are needed to produce one calorie of
meat.
Due to sharp increase in the global population there is a
growing demand for food grains. Currently 36% of the calories produced by World
crops are utilised as animal feed and only 12% of calories contribute to human
diet. The population of the livestock is 14 billion as compared to human
population of 7.2 billion and their environmental foot print is much higher.
Livestock accounts for 14.5% of the Green House Gas (GHG) Emissions. Live stock
production consumes three times more water resources than agriculture
accounting for 71% of World water consumption. Livestock production occupies
about 30% of Earth’s land surface. Moreover, extensive rearing of livestock
over a period of time resulted in the biodiversity loss and extinction of other
wild animals.
Incidence of various diseases like
diabetes, heart attacks, strokes etc increased with regular consumption of
meat. Obesity has become a chronic problem in all meat eating nations. On an
average while the consumption of meat in India is 3.2 kilograms it is 125.4
kilograms in US, the second largest meat consuming nation after Luxembourg.
Worryingly the demand for meat is projected to increase by 50 % by 2025 with
Asian countries accounting for a large part of it.
Higher demand for meat will be
catastrophic for environment. To meet the increasing demand meat suppliers
would resort to feeding the livestock with food grains rather than grass. This
in turn would put great pressure on the food grains, natural resources and
environment. Livestock are injected with hormones to trigger growth and as a
prophylactic measure fed with antibiotics to curtail spread of diseases. In
fact most of the deadly diseases of recent origin infecting humans are mostly
Zoonotic (originated from animals). The disposal of livestock wastes largely
results in contamination of water and oil with antibiotic residues and other
high metal elements.
While the burden of changing to
animal based diet on environment and health is extensively studied and
documented, the message has failed to reach the intended subjects. With the
World glaring at the imminent natural resources crunch, increasing global
temperatures, burgeoning population and increasing demand for food grains and
ever increasing health complications- it is high time that people change their
dietary habits.
It is advisable to rely more on plant
based diets for their calorific needs to reduce pressure on natural resources
and environment. To this end, government and civil society should take the
responsibility of spreading this message of promoting healthier plant based
diet.
Interestingly, a recent research
indicated that if crops are not diverted towards animal feeds and for bio fuel
production an extra four billion people can be fed. Meat consumption actually
releases more GHG’s than the cars annually. According to FAO report, beef
production on average needs 28 times more land, 11 times more water than all
other livestock categories and produces five times more GHG and six times more
reactive nitrogen. While it is difficult for people to become vegetarian
completely, they can choose other meat alternatives like chicken or sea food
which is less resource- intensive.
Thus adopting a healthy plant based
diet with minimal meat consumption would not only help in conservation of
resources and minimising global warming but also helps in stemming the
incidence of various life style diseases. If emission of green house gases can
be minimised extreme climate changes can be averted and global health too can
be conserved. Switch to a balanced diet to save our planet.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Thursday, 4 June 2015
New Revelations About Pluto
Few interesting results about the dwarf planet Pluto are
published in Nature six weeks ahead of NASA’s New Horizons first fly-by. New
Horizons Mission will zoom past Pluto on July 14th within 12,500 km
of planet’s surface. It is expected to unravel more details about Pluto. Besides
the popular Earth- Moon binary planet system in our Solar System, another pair
that falls in same category is the Pluto-Charon system. With a mass of 11% of the
Pluto, Charon its brighter moon, orbits the binary planet system centre of mass
at a distance of 17,500 km every 6.4days The images of the Hubble Space
Telescope (HST) revealed presence of four circumbinary satellites whose masses
roughly 0.001% of Pluto. These are the inner most and least massive of moons Styx, others are Nix, Kerberos and Hydra.
These three bodies are so closely packed that it hardly leaves room for any
stable satellite to exist between their orbits. The new finding essentially
sheds light on satellites and planet formation and how they remain stable in
their orbits for billions of years.
The Plutoid system helps us to understand how every object
has gravitational sphere of influence that prevents other objects from orbiting
nearby. Hence larger the size of object greater will be its sphere of
influence. When the sphere of influences of neighbouring objects overlap, it is
impossible to place any object on the stable orbits between them. So smaller
objects like interplanetary dust might orbit in their intervening spaces but
larger objects cannot.
Till now scientists had a different hypothesis regarding the
formation of satellites or planets around a star. It was thought that a satellite
or planet start as a small seed in a disk or a ring surrounding the star (or
planet) at the centre. These seeds start growing by agglomeration of other
small solid objects in its path. Eventually these growing bodies would
experience the gravitational pull of other adjacent objects. Continued growth would
result in overpacking whereby sphere of influence of many objects would
overlap. As the gravitational forces increases, the orbital motions become
chaotic prompting the merger of nearby objects. This hypothesis is strikingly
different from the Pluto-Charon system wherein it is conceived that proto-Pluto
and proto-Charon might have collided to form a binary planet surrounded by
expanding ring of debris. Pre-moons might have survived the collision and new
moons might have grown from small particles in the debris. The four moons that
have resulted from this process are found to have an orbital periods in the
ratio of (3:4:5:6) to that of Charon.
Astronomers Showalter
and Hamilton have worked out the orbital period, orientation and the
ellipticity of each orbit. Styx, Nix and
Hydra are locked together as what is referred as three-body resonance system
a phenomenon wherein timings of their orbits are linked coordinating and
stabilizing their movements (preventing them from crashing into each other).
Perhaps, this is the reason why a dwarf planet like Pluto has so many moons. A
similar three-body resonance system is found among Jupiter’s moons- Lo, Europa and Ganymede. Nix and Hydra have bright
surfaces similar to Charon and reflects 40% of light that hits it Kerberos is
as dark as coal. Thus this raises questions about formation of the heterogenous
satellite system. Binary planets constitute two bodies of similar planetary mass
orbiting their common barycentre. The mutual motions of this binary create an asymmetric
gravitational field inducing wobbles in the orbits of the outer most moons. Nix
and Hydra rotate chaotically, meaning they don’t keep the same side facing
Charon-Pluto driven by the Pluto-Charon binary system. Implying that there might
be days when sunrises in the east and sets in the north for the satellites of
Pluto.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Wednesday, 27 May 2015
Modi @ 365: State of Scientific Affairs
Thanks to the aspirational
leadership of Prime Minister Modi foreign policy is ahead of curve but lack of
visionary leadership in scientific affairs failed to make impressive gains. The
enthusiasm and vitality needed to kick start STEAM (Science, Technology,
Engineering, Agriculture and Medicine) was missing. Modi, who clinched power on
the vociferous commitment towards change and development, instilled a ray of
hope in the scientific community too. During his first Prime Ministerial
address from the ramparts of the Red fort on the eve of Independence Day with
the grand announcement of ‘Make in India’ scientists believed that indigenous science
and technology would be bolstered and believed that acche din would ensue. To accomplish the task of good governance
and transparency too digitisation has to be stepped up. For the ease of doing
business to become a reality, advanced the technical know-how has to be augured.
Thus these propellers are expected to generate a needed momentum to usher the
potential Indian science into a new realm of scientific exuberance.
At ground level the new regime
was welcomed by the burden of discrepancies, discontinuities in implementation
of various schemes and pending appointment of heads to various elite national
institutions of the UPA II. In a bid to
revamp the appointment process and bring in transparency, the new government
scrapped the old appointment process. Earlier appointment of heads was made by
a search committee of eminent scientists who would talk to probable candidates
informally or would walk in without prior notice into their work places and
approve candidature. According to the
new system advertisement of the vacant posts, screening and short listing of applications,
holding of interview have become mandatory to make an official appointment. This
move was welcomed by a group of scientists who believed that it created an
equal opportunity for the rapidly growing scientific faculty overriding the
rider of familiarity and high-connections. However top-notch scientists rebuked
the decision as they have to invest extra valuable man-hours to screen numerous
applications before making a crucial appointment.
Consequently Modi government is mired
in the quagmire of appointing heads for several elite national research
institutions. Of the 38 institutions, currently only 25 have full term heads
and others are managed by temporary or acting heads. Since January 2014, CSIR
(Council for Scientific and Industrial Research) the backbone for scientific
and technological research institute is without a head. With stalling of
several key appointments, the national innovation system will bear the brunt.
Meanwhile the intentions of
government were severely doubted and the veracity of their commitment was
blissfully lost in the cacophony of dubious arguments about ancient Indian
scientific and technological prowess made during the Indian Science Congress. Scientists
opined that hankering to the ancient glory is a futile exercise if we fail to
attain excellence in the contemporary sciences. While the appointment of the
renowned physician Dr. Harshvardhan as the Minister of Science and Technology
was highly applauded, his subsequent removal for political reasons was regarded
as clumsy step. The much awaited budgetary allocations made on the National
Science Day, couldn’t cheer scientific community as no big-ticket initiatives
or big-bang reforms were announced. With no perceptible increase in fund
allocation to research and development, acche
din seem to still elude Indian scientists. Despite profusely thanking scientists for
their relentless pursuits on the astounding success of Mangalyaan mission the
allocation to Department of Space pegged at Rs 6000 crores wasn’t increased in
the budget. Although India is located in an earthquake region the finances for
Department of Earth sciences was reduced by 7%. High level of protein malnutrition
is prevalent in India but central nodal agricultural research agency, Indian
Council for Agriculture Research (ICAR) is tipped to experience a fund shortage
of 24 crores.
Modi government flagged off several
new scientific initiatives. A fund of Rs 50 Crore was allocated to a
collaborative effort between the US and ISRO, for constructing and launching of
a high-end satellite NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar Mission (NISAR) by
2012. It aims to observe earth and monitoring climate change. To boost up
three-stage nuclear programme, budget allocation for Department of Atomic
Energy was increased by 12.6%. Interestingly allocation to Ministry of water
resources was slashed by 50%. As a friendly gesture towards the SAARC nations
Modi announced earlier that ISRO would develop a geostationary SAARC satellite
positioned over the subcontinent. Accordingly Rs 2 crore is allotted to ISRO
towards construction of the satellite.
To propel the ‘Digital India’ and
‘Make in India’ initiatives a National Super Computing Facility was launched.
It connects the national academic and R&D institutions with a grid over 70
high-performance computing facilities. With regards to supercomputing while
China is number 1 with 500 supercomputers India is ranked 74 and has 9 such
computers. The high performance computing will give a major fillip to financial
services, weather forecasting, earth quake forecasting, space craft, vehicle
and ship designing, oil exploration missions.
Elevation and appointment of
visionary scientific leaders like Dr. Vijaya Raghavan to Department of
Biotechnology and Dr. Ashutosh Sharma to Department of Science and Technology
instilled new hope and scientific vigour by cutting down bureaucratic red-tape.
In a major move Dr. Sharma mandated that time taken from submission of a
project proposal to its analysis and scrutiny and receipt of funds be completed
in four months. With trimming of funds allotted to DBT, Dr. Raghavan intends to
partner with state governments under the grand “cooperative federalism” and
make use of the limited resources at his dispensation.
Extension of the retirement for
senior scientists used to be a norm in India. This system prevented the
promotion of younger generation into higher echelons. The unceremonious sacking
of former Defence and Research Organisation (DRDO) head Avinash Chander who was
an extension of contract by the Defence Minister didn’t go well with senior
scientists. Similarly four other senior scientists too were denied of
extensions after retirement. With denial of extensions after retirement Modi
government has reversed the trend of UPA where in 11 senior scientists are on
extension from 2012 in premier institutions and thus new blood is infused into
system.
To bride the energy deficit, Modi
made strong pitch for renewable sources of energy and set an ambitious target
of generating 100 gigawatts of of solar power by 2020. Currently India generates
23 gigawatts of power becoming the fourth largest producer of wind power,
equalling Spain. To effectuate “gigawatt obsession” giant solar plants are to
be constructed in huge stretches of land. But obtaining land from areas with
dense population and infrastructure is meted with stiff opposition. Building
giant solar parks in remote areas and connecting them to existing electrical
grid system is cumbersome. Analysts in renewable energy field worried that specialised
focus on solar power units might shadow the past successes of the wind power.
If initiatives of Digital India
and Make in India have to truly succeed indigenous manufacturing sector has to
be robust, economical and should be infused with advanced technology. Finally
the dream of creating more jobs in the defence and manufacturing sector can be
achieved by strengthening Indian Science. The grandiose plans of vibrant India
are pointless until unless Indian science is fostered.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Tuesday, 26 May 2015
Attributes of Indian Science
In a piquant message to the researchers and aspiring students
Prime Minister Narendra Modi asked them to “Dream, imagine and explore”. During
the inauguration of 102th Annual Science Conference Modi refrained from making
eloquent promise of enhanced funding but apprised scientists of crucial
challenges- water, energy and health care. Almost 80% of India’s imports
include energy supplies. Therefore NDA government at the helm of affairs was
keen on making India self-reliant in terms of energy. It had set an ambitious
goal of developing 100 gigawatts solar energy by 2020. Accordingly, it has been
aggressively pushing forward the projects to jump start from the existing
capacity of 3.7 gigawatt solar-capacity which is 1.4% of India’s total
electricity generation. Some analysts were apprehensive about the feasibility
of such ambitious approach.
Systemic Problems of
Indian Science
Indian science is abetted by problems like poor-quality
education, interference of bureaucracy and inadequate funding. These stifling
conditions prompted numerous budding scientists to leave the country for
greener pastures. Consequentially India has been conspicuously losing its
intellectual treasure trove. Successive governments vouched to increase funding
to research and development to 2% of GDP (gross domestic product).
Unfortunately even the latest budget allocation too remained at a staggering
low of less than 0.9% of GDP. Unceremoniously government officials’ quips back
scientists demand saying that India on an average spends around $150,000 per
scientist per year which is comparable to other countries. Unable to stem the
systemic problems plaguing the system and vie with its peer nations- whose
financial allocation hovers around 2% of GDP, India lags behind in BRIC group. Two
decades ago the proportion of GDP allocated to research and development (GERD)
in India was more than China but now it is half of China. Despite its huge
population India has the lowest number of engineers and scientists in the world.
In terms of absolute numbers India has four full-time researchers per 10,000
people and China has 18 researchers, in developed countries the number is 80. Another
major stumbling block in Indian Universities is over-bureaucratization and
entrenched red-tape leading to inordinate delays in obtaining equipment and
material for research. The collaboration between universities and industry is
abysmally low and consequently the most prosperous business model of Laboratory
(research)-industry- Market (innovation) is failing to find its foot hold in
India. Further the burden of funding the research has to borne by government as
the investment of private companies in R&D is barely significant.
Deteriorating Standards
of Education
While some scientists are hopeful of a bright future for
Indian science others expressed great resentment over the sub-standard
education. Appallingly, India is the only BRICS nation whose Universities
failed to make it to the top 200 institutions of the World. There are over 700
Universities in India which include the elite institutions funded by the
central government, 300 state universities and 200 private institutions. The
National Scientific research Institutes and elite institutions are doing
World-class research and publishing in high impact journals providing major
fillip to India’s reputation. These institutes account for a major leap in
India’s research output. But the State Universities which are cash-starved
account for majority of the science undergraduates. Unfortunately these institutes
suffer from shortage of quality faculty, libraries and equipped laboratories.
While there is a sharp rise in the number of students pursuing higher
education, institutions neither have the infrastructure nor financial support
to harness the aspirations of the students.
Beacons of Hope
The two major areas of crowning glory for Indian Science are
the meticulously designed space missions and the incredibly low-priced
vaccines. The silver lining for Indian science in the recent past has been the
resounding success of the ISRO’s (Indian Space Research Organisation) space
programmes. Established in 1969, bracing failures during early days of
inception ISRO has transformed into an epitome for exceptional alacrity,
precision and deftness. The organisation acclaimed international repute with
its exceptionally economical MOM (Mars Orbiter Mission) or Mangalyaan. With
space scientists mastering the construction of formidable cryogenic engines
needed to lift-off satellites of over 4 tonnes, India is poised to emerge as a
super power in space research. Rejuvenated by its successful debut of the Mars
Mission, with strengthened resolve ISRO scientists are now gearing for launch
of ASTROSTAT satellite, Chandrayaan-2 mission in 2017, and Aditya Mission 2018.
Chandrayaan-2, a follow-up of Chandrayaan-1 of 2008 has an ambitious agenda of studying
of the composition of Moon and intends to send a lander, six wheeled rover and
an orbiter to moon. Aditya Mission will study Sun’s corona.
Another precious feather in India’s cap is the booming
Biotech industry. The entrepreneurial Indian scientists with their ingenuity
achieved ground-breaking success in the field of vaccine production. Affordable healthcare is an elixir of all
ails for a hugely a populated country like India. The quintessential resources
for a robust health care system are vaccines. The task of manufacturing
indigenous vaccines at nominal prices was accomplished by enterprising young
Indian scientists.. Bharat Biotech International Limited (BBIL) reached this
milestone by developing Revac B+ hepatitis vaccines for USD 3 a dose (currently
available for 30 cents). Subsequently, several Indian biotech companies
contributed enormously towards reducing the burden of public health care in
India and other third world countries by developing affordable, quality
vaccines against infectious diseases. India is now fondly hailed as the “Pharmacy
of the developing World,” by global charity doctors without borders. Now India
has attained marginal success in producing generic drugs through reverse
engineering. In 2014 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued notices to
some Indian companies that failed to meet the quality standards and drug
efficiency. But now these are being slowly sorted out. Indian science
especially the department of biotechnology is upbeat about Indian companies due
to significant rise in number of small and medium sized biotech units.
Though Indian research is not completely bogged down by the
institutional deficiencies but the quality of research is not on par with
advanced countries. Interestingly, in terms of output indicators like the
number of research papers published per the amount of money spent in dollars,
India is one of the top performers in the World. Propitiously the proportion of
Indian students graduating in US and
returning back has increased considerably offering a great hope for brighter
prospects for research in India. Scientific publications have quadrupled from
2000 to 2013. Indian Science with all its inherent deficiencies and exemplary
accomplishments is poised to reach new horizons is in dire need of visionary
leaders to embark on a new journey.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Thursday, 7 May 2015
Complex Archaea: Missing link in evolution of Eukaryotes
From early 18th century to a larger part of 20th
century biologists accepted Darwin’s theory of natural selection which
postulated that life on earth evolved from a single cell or pre-cell. The concept
described as concept of tree of life
believed that diverse species descended from common ancestors. In 1962 an
interesting paper submitted by Roger Stainer and C. B. Van Niel categorised
living organisms into prokaryotes and Eukaryotes based on cellular
organisation. Later in 1977 Carl Woese
and George E Fox experimentally disproved the universally held hypotheses of
tree of life. They reported of a third kingdom Archaea bacteria defined as a
new urkingdom (domain) distinct from the bacteria and eukaryotes. He redrew the
phylogenetic tree with three domains- Bacteria, Archaea and Eucarya. This new
hypothesis drew severe criticism from reputed scientists who refused to accept
the speculation about an era of rapid evolution where considerable horizontal
transfer of genes has occurred. Often termed
as extremophiles, Archaea are anaerobic and can thrive in extreme weather
conditions. Now most biologists believe that they are very ancient and could
exist in conditions not conducive for normal life. It is predicted that
organisms similiar to Archaea could exist in other planets. Eukaryotes and
Archaea were considered sister groups for their similarities in genes and
metabolic pathways.
In 1996 Woese with his team of scientists published the full
genome or blue print of an organism in the domain Archaea and concluded that
they are more closely related to Eukaryotes than bacteria. The signature sequence
of ribosomal RNA genes found in all organisms was used as a basis to assess the
variations or similarities. These studies helped to confirm that Archaea
constitute a separate group as it contained hundreds of genes which had no
counterparts in either bacteria or eukarya. But the ribosomal proteins of
Archaea were similar to those of Eukarya.
Earliest Eukaryotes came into existence 2 billion years ago.
The origin of Eukaryotic cell remained a contentious puzzle for biologists for
long. While cytologically bacteria and archaea are relatively simple,
eukaryotic cell is complex and highly specialised it is hence hard to reconcile
the popular hypothesis of prokaryote to eukaryote transition. One of the prevalent hypotheses about the
origin of complex cell is that earliest eukaryotes arose when an archaeon
engulfed a bacterium and continued to exist in a symbiotic relationship with
it. The engulfed bacterium eventually developed into mitochondria, the power
house of cell. Mitochondria are present
in all eukaryotes and its gene sequences are clearly related to
Alphaproteobacteria. During the early genomic era, analysis of eukaryotic genome
indicated that it was chimaeric in nature containing both bacterial and archaeal
genes besides associated eukaryotic genes. While some of the genes could be
traced back to alphaproteobacteria the lineage of eukaryotic host remained
obscure.
A scientific article
published in Nature by Thijis Ettema
of Uppsala University uncovered the mystery of origin of eukaryotic cell. Dr.
Ettema and team collected samples from the sea bed of Svalbard, few kilometres from
an underwater volcano, Loki’s Castle for a microbial diversity study. A Phylogenetic
analyses of Deep Sea Archaeal Group (DSAG) of the Loki Castle region named as
Lokiarchaeota is believed to be the missing link between the single-celled
organisms to complex living beings. Lokiarchaeota belong to the
deeply-branching clade of the archaeal TACK superphylum, sans mitochondria and
contains proteins not found in any other archaea but present in Eukaryotes.
Using deep metagenomics technique, 92% of composite gene
sequence of Lokiarcheota is assembled. Around 175 predicted microbial proteins
were found to be similar to eukaryotes proteins involved in phagocytosis, cell
shape formation and membrane remodelling. Archaeal genome contained five actin
homologs that are more similar to eukaryote actins than to archaeal actin-like
proteins. Nearly 70 homologs of Ras-family small GTPases accounting for 2% of
predicted proteins are found in archaea. Gene sequences for ESCRT proteins and
proteins involved in intracellular vesicle trafficking mechanisms are also
found. The sheer size of similarities of
proteins between Lokiarchaeota and Eukaryotes suggest that these might have
been the primitive ancestors of Eukaryotes. They could have paved way for the
development of eukaryotes. With proteins needed for phagocytosis they could
have started engulfing single celled organisms (one them could have been the alphaproteobacteria).
Harboured with basic machinery of cytoskeleton, it might have moved around like
amoeba engulfing prey. These set of exciting revelations indicate that probably
Lokiarcheaota might have been the missing link between the prokaryotes and
Eukaryotes.
A. Spang et al.,
“Complex archaea that bridge the gap between prokaryotes and eukaryotes,” Nature,
doi:10.1038/nature14447, 2015.
Thursday, 30 April 2015
Trajectory of Science in Arab Spring Countries
The spark of the Arab spring ignited four years back in the Middle
East and North Africa besides creating indefinite chaos and uncertainty buried
the penchant for good science. Unleashing of the pent up frustration triggered
a wave of uprising resulting in toppling of regimes in Egypt, Tunisia, Syria,
Libya and Yemen. The new governments in these regions are now volatile and the
situation of the scientists have taken a different trajectory altogether. Current
Issue of Nature chronicled the profiles of scientists in Tunisia, Egypt and Syria
to fathom the damage caused by the demonstrations and revolts held under the
banner of Arab Spring.
Of all these nations Tunisia is back on its heels as its bold civil society have fought
tooth and nail to restore complete democracy. The nation had long tradition of
extending great support to education and research. It was one of the best performers
in terms of scientific output than any other Arab nations other than Saudi
Arabia before the revolution. Government mandated 1% of GDP towards education
and research. But the repressive regimes stifled the academic freedom as all
the appointments in the university were controlled by the government.
Scientific institutions were not autonomous and their policies and strategies
were strictly scrutinised by the government. Hence research related to
sensitive issues especially in social sciences suffered a death blow. The bureaucrats
used to block the linkages between the universities and industries. But the situation
began to change after the democratic government was reinstated. Parliament
passed a bill which guaranteed free speech, freedom of expression, religious
freedom and equality between sexes. With the new reforms the scientific society
is quite optimistic about the future of the country. It will still take some
time for the new changes to permeate into the system and yield perceptible
results in higher education and scientific innovations. The recent incident of assassinations
of foreign tourists in Bardo National Museum in Tunis by radical extremists has
raised few doubts about complete restoration of peace and stability in the
country. But Scientists are very pragmatic as political influence and nepotism
has almost reduced. Tunisia perhaps is the only country which has stabilised
itself after four years of the revolution.
Egypt: With the toppling of authoritarian regime of
Hosni Mubarak in 2011 Egyptian scientists working abroad saw a ray of hope and
returned to their native land. The new government promised to double funding
for science in 2012 but due to lack of objective vision nearly 80% of the funds
were left unused. Following a coup democratically elected leader Mohammed Morsi
was replaced by Abdel Fattah Sisi in 2013. All the gains made in 2012 followed
by the uprisings of students and researchers were reversed by the new regime.
The government started taking final call on the appointments but thankfully new
constitution passed in 2014 allotted 1% of GDP for scientific research.
Researchers believe that majority of it would be spend in the form of salaries
and other allowances leaving little scope for building new infrastructure. Due
to severe restrictions on the movement of the scientific material across the
borders the procurement of needed supplies and chemicals for laboratories has
become an arduous and time-consuming process. Most scientists complain that
this has been major deterrent for carrying out productive research. Above all
researchers in Egypt feel that the mindset of people must changes to have
greater scientific output.
Syria: While the situation in Tunisia and
Egypt has relatively stabilised the hopes of revival of Syria are steadily
deteriorating. What has started as a restive movement against lack of freedom
of expression turned into a civil war with joining of more factions leaving a little
hope of restoration of peace. During the past four years some amount of education
and research activities were carried out by a committed bunch of scientists and
researchers who refused to budge from their responsibilities and felt obligated
towards the future generation of the country. Life in Syria started becoming
more difficult. With lack of security, access to water or fuel and skyrocketing
of prices scores of the scientists have moved out of Syria. Since the regime
has passed a resolution drafting all men to army, people are left with options
of either taking up arms or fled Syria (in other words either to kill or get
killed). The International Centre for Agriculture Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA)
struggled to function till 2012 and as international researchers started
leaving Syria even the centre moved to Lebanon. Researchers who are working in
Syria say that working conditions have become extremely difficult and
subsequently the quality of research was affected. In some places students and
faculty have to tread through danger zones to attend Universities. With ISIS
taking control over eastern Syria, schools and Universities in those regions
were closed and people are forced to flee.
The Arab Spring indeed sparked a massive revolution but
unfortunately some countries are doused by the very fire of renaissance while
some of them are trying to get back to normalcy.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Friday, 27 March 2015
Threatening Proportions of Myopia
“World has become myopic,” is a colloquial trite. But believe it or not, the situation is really alarming. A recently
published article in Nature reported that East Asian countries are afflicted by
threatening proportions of myopia or short-sightedness, the inability to see
objects at longer distances. In China up to 90% of the teenagers are myopic and
figures even disturbing for Seoul where it is 96.5%. While immediate course
corrections like glasses, contact lenses and surgery can offer relief but a
worst case of short sight can increase risk of cataract, retinal detachment,
glaucoma and even blindness.
Myopic condition is the fall of out of the slightly elongated
eyeball which causes the lens to focus light away from the object leading to
formation of image in front of retina instead of direct image formation on the
retina. This condition occurs most commonly in school going kids and adolescents.
It is reported that nearly one-fifth of the college going kids in East Asia
have an extreme form of myopia and half of them are at the risk of developing
irreversible vision loss. The burgeoning
threat of myopia has propelled scientists across the world to address this
issue.
Myopia was believed to be the domain of book-worms who were
considered to be more prone to this defect. Famous German astronomer Johannes Kepler
attributed his short-sightedness to book work. For long even ophthalmologists
too believed in the same dogma. By 1960 scientists believed that it is
genetically transferred as it is common in genetically identical twins than
non-identical twins. Genome analysis showed that 100 regions are responsible
for myopia. Increasing cases of myopia among school children in East Asian
countries has been linked to enhanced educational performance where in students
spend long hours before books. Researchers too have drawn an association
between academic performance and the number of hours of study. On average while
a Chinese teenager spends 15 hours a week on homework against 5 hrs in UK and 6
hrs in USA. Moreover with teenagers becoming addicted to televisions and hooked
onto smart phones eternally, the incidence has peaked.
Documented research reports began to throw light on the
deleterious effects of sustained close work capable of affecting the growth of
eye ball. Scientists at the Ohio State University, College of Optometry
Columbus showed that bright light is protective to eye. The research hypothesis
showed that bright light stimulates release of dopamine neurotransmitter in the
retina blocking the elongation of eye. Diurnal cycle of eye is strongly
controlled by bright light wherein retinal dopamine turns on the cone-based
vision during the day and rod-based vision at night in response to the dim
light. For people working in the dim light or indoors this cycle is messed up
resulting in elongation of the retina.
Research conducted by the Australian National University
estimated that children need to spend a minimum of three hours of day under the
light intensity of 10,000 lux to be guarded against myopia (an over-cast day
provides 10,000 lux against 500 lux of class room). Consequently three hours of
outdoor activity has become a norm in Australia. Now schools in China and
Taiwan are making way for 3 hrs of outdoor time in the school schedule. Preliminary findings in those schools are
promising. Schools which have relatively inflexible routine are contemplating to
conduct classes in rooms fitted with glass to compensate for the outdoor time. An
unpublished research also indicated that as the amount of time spent increased
the incidence began to lessen. Thus, three hours of outdoor time not only
improves the physical well being of the children but protects them against
myopia.
In the meanwhile researchers are working on special glasses
and contact lenses that can alter the eye growth by focusing light from distant
objects at different angles rather than just at the centre as the regular
glasses do. To curtail myopic progression regular use of eye drops with a neurotransmitter-blocking
drug atropine at night is also recommended. A hand book of Ophthalmic Science
and practice authored by Henry Edward Juler in 1904 mentioned that myopic is stationary;
change of air- or possibly a sea voyage was prescribed. It ‘as been more than
hundred years it took a swarm of brilliant brains with years of dedicated research
and sophisticated inventory to confirm the intuitive thinking of yesteryears.
@ Copyrights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)